Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1298
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArama, Madalina-
dc.contributor.authorPascu, Luoana Florentina-
dc.contributor.authorLehr, Carol Blaziu-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-12T09:32:33Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-12T09:32:33Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn1582-9596-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1298-
dc.descriptionEnvironmental Engineering and Management Journal, vol. 17, no. 5, 2018, pp. 1217-1227en_US
dc.description.abstractThe paper presents a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (English acronym MCDA methodology to analyze organization environmental performance indicators designed according to Eco-Management and Audit Scheme III - Regulation (English acronym EMAS III). The newly proposed indicators are intended to achieve Best Environmental Management Practice (English acronym BEMP) to ease and harmonize the way the environmental performance is reported and analyzed periodically within the organization Environmental Management System (English acronym EMS). During each environmental management analysis, the state of accomplishment of the proposed objectives stated in the organization environmental policy should be checked. This way, adequate and timely measures should be taken to meet the objectives and improve environmental performance. While referential documents ISO 14000 standards series and European legislation -EMAS III Regulation requirements are well explained within environmental management literature, the instruments for their implementation at the organizational level need yet improvements. One such improvement endeavor is the release of BEMP sectoral documents which include new EMAS III indicators for environmental performance analysis. Instruments that should be used in order to analyze those environmental performance indicators can also be improved to help manage significant organization environmental impacts and the associated environmental risk. Using results from operational research field and applying them to the environmental management can produce reliable scientifically based methodologies. General considerations about how to use the Analytical Hierarchy Process (English acronym AHP) MCDA tool within environmental management analysis are presented.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisher“Gheorghe Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, Romaniaen_US
dc.subjectAHPen_US
dc.subjectEMSen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmentalen_US
dc.subjectIndicatorsen_US
dc.subjectMCDAen_US
dc.titleSelection and use of EMAS III indicators and AHP methodology in analysis of organization environmental performanceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.grantfulltextreserved-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptNational Research and Development Institute for Industrial Ecology, ECOIND-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5366-8253-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6705-9005-
Appears in Collections:Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat Existing users please
21_850_Arama_14_art_final_publ_extenso.pdf285.31 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.