Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1481
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRada, Elena Cristina-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-14T10:44:19Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-14T10:44:19Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-
dc.identifier.issnL:1843-5831 (online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1481-
dc.descriptionInternational Symposium "The Environment and the Industry", 26-27 September 2019, Bucharest, Romania, pp. 325-332en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the industrial sectors, the ways of release pollutants into the atmosphere can vary significantly. We can find various combinations of primary conveyed emissions, secondary conveyed releases, diffused emissions, depending on the characteristics of the industrial plant. When an environmental impact assessment is performed, discussion concerns mainly the impact on the public health, whilst the occupational impact of these releases is moved to other contexts. The present paper zooms on selected case studies in order to understand the consequences of different way of pollutant release on the outdoor and indoor air quality at the site of the plant (within the fence). Two kinds of pollutants were selected: particulate matter and odoriferous substances. Results demonstrate that the industrial sector is unbalanced: the regulations in force in EU give different attention to the impact of the releases to the atmosphere depending on the industrial sector. In particular, in some sectors the impact of diffused emissions is underestimated because of a raw management of their control. Some preliminary proposals are put forwards for a better management of the emissions to the atmosphere in potentially critical cases. These proposals are based on the concept that conveyed solutions for pollutant release must be preferred, with the care of designing the related stacks with an optimised combination of stack height, conveyed gas velocity, temperature at the exit. The opposition to this approach is basically related to the additional costs. This article demonstrate that these extra-costs are due in many cases. Their economic sustainability is discussed too.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNational Research and Development Institute for Industrial Ecology, INCD-ECOINDen_US
dc.subjectEconomic sustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectEmissionsen_US
dc.subjectIndustrial impacten_US
dc.subjectOdouren_US
dc.subjectParticulate matteren_US
dc.titleSome considerations on indoor and outdoor impacts of different ways of pm release and odour emission in industrial sectorsen_US
dc.typeConference paperen_US
item.openairetypeConference paper-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:SIMI 2019
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
fp 41.pdf518.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.