Options
Effect of Cr Pic supplementation in layers’ diet enriched with Omega-3 fatty acids, on productive performances and egg quality traits
Date issued
2015
Author(s)
Cornescu, Gabriela Maria
Criste, Rodica Diana
Grosu, Horia
Panaite, Tatiana
Untea, Arabela
Cruceru, Liliana
Abstract
An experimental study of four weeks was conducted on one hundred eighty-four caged Lohmann Brown hens (49 weeks) which were randomly allocated to four dietary treatments (46 hens/treatment). The control diet (C) was based on a corn and soybean meal; E1 group included flaxseed meal (5%) and camelina meal (2%), which are omega 3 rich sources; E2 had the same basal diet as C group and 150 ppb CrPic in premix; E3 had the same basal diet as E1 group and 150 ppb CrPic in premix. Egg weight was significantly higher (P≤ 0.05) to C compare to other experimental groups, but yolk weight to C group was significantly (P≤ 0.05) lower compare to other 3 groups. Eggshell thickness and eggshell breaking strength was not influenced by the presence of omega 3 acids, nor by CrPic inclusion. Egg production on E1 (86.5 ± 3.3%) was negatively influenced by the dietary presence of omega 3 fatty acids, but the presence of CrPic in E3 diet determined a similar egg
production (93.3 ± 5.3%) with C group (93.6 ± 3.3%). On the other hand, CrPic inclusion in E2 and E3 groups determined a significantly (P≤ 0.05) lower egg weight (E2: 64.3 ± 0.7 g; E3: 64.0 ± 0.5 g) compare with the groups without CrPic supplement (C: 65.93 ± 0.5 g; E1: 65.0 ± 0.6 g). Analysis of litter collected during the experiment showed that Cr III concentration registered no difference between the treatment groups.
production (93.3 ± 5.3%) with C group (93.6 ± 3.3%). On the other hand, CrPic inclusion in E2 and E3 groups determined a significantly (P≤ 0.05) lower egg weight (E2: 64.3 ± 0.7 g; E3: 64.0 ± 0.5 g) compare with the groups without CrPic supplement (C: 65.93 ± 0.5 g; E1: 65.0 ± 0.6 g). Analysis of litter collected during the experiment showed that Cr III concentration registered no difference between the treatment groups.
Files
Loading...
Name
art 2 serie 2.pdf
Size
59.68 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):4c2116745e340dec5c158f7fa4d25314