Options
Hybrid sonolysis application as polishing step for removal of thms generated from the drinking water treatment
ISSN
1843-5831
Date issued
2017
DOI
10.21698/simi.2017.0001
Abstract
"Trihalomethanes (THMs) are organic compounds (with toxicity potential) generated during the classical treatment flow of drinking water as a result of reaction between natural organic matter (always present in drinking waters resources) and chlorine, which is the most disinfection reagent on a broad scale, in drinking water treatment plants. Ultrasonic treatment can be feasible for THMs removal for small or medium
drinking water treatment plants.
This paper emphasyzes the possiblity to use sonolysis (chemical oxidation based on active radicals generated during cavitation process) as polishing step in drinking water treatment flow for trihalomethanes (THMs - trichloromethane, tribromomethane and bromodichloromethane) removal (initial concentrations over the admitted limit - 100 µg THM/l).
Four sonolysis systems were tested for synthetic and real surface treated water: direct sonolysis (US), US + H2O2, US + H2O2 + Fe (Fenton sonolysis), US + H2O2 + Fe + UV (low pressure mercury lamp = 250 - 400 nm). The variation domains of the main process parameters were as following: THMs concentrations 310 ÷ 3615 µg/L, sonolysis time 1 ÷ 60 min., ultrasonic energy 2x106 J - 8x106 J, ultrasonic amplitude 20 ÷ 80%, oxidant dose 0.6 ÷ 2.1 g H2O2/L, catalyst dose 0.25 ÷ 2 mg Fe2+/L.
Experimental results showed the evolution of THMs removal depending on sonolysis system: direct sonolysis (US) 56% < sonolysis and hidrogen peroxide (US + H2O2) 59% < foto Fenton sonolysis (US + H2O2 + Fe + UV) 63% < Fenton sonolysis (US + H2O2 + Fe) 73% emphasizing that bromoform are more difficult to remove compared to other."
drinking water treatment plants.
This paper emphasyzes the possiblity to use sonolysis (chemical oxidation based on active radicals generated during cavitation process) as polishing step in drinking water treatment flow for trihalomethanes (THMs - trichloromethane, tribromomethane and bromodichloromethane) removal (initial concentrations over the admitted limit - 100 µg THM/l).
Four sonolysis systems were tested for synthetic and real surface treated water: direct sonolysis (US), US + H2O2, US + H2O2 + Fe (Fenton sonolysis), US + H2O2 + Fe + UV (low pressure mercury lamp = 250 - 400 nm). The variation domains of the main process parameters were as following: THMs concentrations 310 ÷ 3615 µg/L, sonolysis time 1 ÷ 60 min., ultrasonic energy 2x106 J - 8x106 J, ultrasonic amplitude 20 ÷ 80%, oxidant dose 0.6 ÷ 2.1 g H2O2/L, catalyst dose 0.25 ÷ 2 mg Fe2+/L.
Experimental results showed the evolution of THMs removal depending on sonolysis system: direct sonolysis (US) 56% < sonolysis and hidrogen peroxide (US + H2O2) 59% < foto Fenton sonolysis (US + H2O2 + Fe + UV) 63% < Fenton sonolysis (US + H2O2 + Fe) 73% emphasizing that bromoform are more difficult to remove compared to other."
Files
No Thumbnail Available
Name
Hydrid WOS record.pdf
Size
172.72 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):d00fdc997e2f270e43a8484e2d6b60c4
Loading...
Name
1.pdf
Size
599.68 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):fcb0ac7349af6fb7bf72685a28203bf6